A coalition of Minnesota school districts and the state’s teachers union, Education Minnesota, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court demanding the reinstatement of a decades-old federal policy barring immigration enforcement activities near schools and other ‘sensitive locations.’
Background on the Lawsuit
The lawsuit, filed on February 4, 2026, names Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, her department, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, and numerous federal officials as defendants.
Minnesota schools take a stand against federal immigration enforcement policies. Learn more about the lawsuit and its potential implications for education policy nationwide.
Impact on Schools
The presence of ICE agents near schools has led to increased absenteeism, with some districts reporting over a third of children absent or learning online on any given day. Many students have simply disappeared.
The presence of ICE agents near schools has created a climate of fear and uncertainty, making it difficult for students to focus on their education.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Response from Education Leaders
Education leaders say schools are being targeted as intensively as at any point in the last two months, despite promises of reduced enforcement. The lawsuit claims federal agents’ actions ‘violate the Administrative Procedure Act and constitutional protections, and that DHS failed to adequately consider the educational and community impacts when it rescinded prior guidance limiting enforcement in sensitive locations.’
Key takeaways
-
- Minnesota school districts and the state teachers union filed a lawsuit: against the federal government to reinstate limits on immigration enforcement near schools.
- Absenteeism has increased: due to the presence of ICE agents near schools.
- Education leaders are speaking out: against the federal government's actions.
Looking Ahead
The outcome of the lawsuit remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the situation has sparked a national conversation about the intersection of immigration enforcement and education policy.
The situation in Minnesota serves as a reminder that education policy and immigration enforcement are intricately linked. As the lawsuit moves forward, it will be important to consider the potential implications for schools and communities nationwide. Learn more about how you can support education policy that prioritizes student success.
See what All Access gives your child
See MTSS for schools
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.
References
