A bipartisan group of Colorado lawmakers has introduced a bill aimed at reducing the time spent on standardized testing for students in grades 3-8. The bill, Senate Bill 68, would create a review committee to study and recommend cuts to testing time.
Background on CMAS Testing
Currently, students in grades 3-8 spend around 8-11 hours per year on Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS) math and reading assessments. High school students, on the other hand, spend approximately 3.5 hours on the PSAT and SAT.
Colorado lawmakers introduce bill to reduce standardized testing time for grades 3-8. What does this mean for students and educators?
Support for the Bill
Parents, teachers, superintendents, and school board members testified in favor of the bill, citing the need to reduce testing time and find a better balance between assessment and instruction. Kelly Jones-Wagy, a parent and teacher, applauded the lawmakers for approving the bill, stating that it’s not about ending school accountability but about lowering the amount of hours spent on testing.
The bill isn’t about ending school accountability but about lowering the amount of hours spent on testing.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Legislative Process
The bill will now head to the Senate Appropriations Committee. If approved, it will need to pass the full Senate and then the House before it can be sent to the governor’s desk for signature.
Key takeaways
- Bill Introduction: Senate Bill 68 aims to reduce standardized testing time for grades 3-8.Current Testing Time: Students in grades 3-8 spend 8-11 hours per year on CMAS assessments.Support and Next Steps: The bill has received support from parents, teachers, and educators, and will now proceed to the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Implications and Next Steps
The passage of this bill could have significant implications for the education system in Colorado, potentially leading to a reduction in testing time and a shift in focus towards more instruction and student support. As the bill moves forward, it will be important to monitor its progress and consider the potential impacts on students, teachers, and schools.
The advancement of Senate Bill 68 marks a significant step towards reevaluating the role of standardized testing in Colorado’s education system. As the bill moves forward, it’s essential for parents, educators, and lawmakers to continue the conversation about finding a balance between assessment and instruction that truly supports student learning and success.
See what All Access gives your child
See MTSS for schools
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.
References
