California leaders are weighing the potential consequences of retaining attendance-based funding for schools, a move that could avoid multibillion-dollar annual costs. The decision comes after an analyst’s report found that switching to an enrollment-based funding formula could have unexpected consequences, including reducing student attendance in the long run.
Current Funding Formula
California currently funds schools based on actual daily attendance, which can result in significant losses for districts with high chronic absenteeism rates. This has led to budget cuts, layoffs, and school closures in some areas.
California considers retaining attendance-based school funding. What does this mean for students and schools? #education #funding
Proposed Changes
A bill introduced by Senator Anthony Portantino aimed to evaluate the tradeoffs of switching to an enrollment-based funding formula. However, the Legislative Analyst’s Office report found that this change could lead to reduced student attendance and exacerbate student learning loss.
Quote: ‘The current funding formula can be challenging for schools with high chronic absenteeism rates.’ Attribution: Senator Anthony Portantino
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
State Response
Instead of pursuing a change to the funding mechanism, the state is seeking to improve the current model by reducing chronic absenteeism. The goal is to halve chronic absence rates in the next five years and pass bills to protect students from immigration enforcement, which can cause spikes in student absences.
Key takeaways
- Key Findings: California may retain attendance-based school funding.
- Current Challenges: Chronic absenteeism affects funding.
- Proposed Solution: Reduce absenteeism to improve funding stability.
Implications
The decision to retain attendance-based funding has significant implications for schools and students in California. While it may avoid short-term costs, it also means that districts will continue to face challenges related to chronic absenteeism and funding instability.
As California navigates the complexities of school funding, it’s essential for parents, educators, and policymakers to work together to find solutions that prioritize student success and well-being. By addressing the root causes of chronic absenteeism and promoting attendance-based funding, we can create a more equitable and effective education system for all.
See what All Access gives your child
See MTSS for schools
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.
References
