Teen Dyslexia Advocate Gives Kids What Schools Often Don’t
Last updated:
When your child struggles to read and the school returns your call with a packet of accommodations instead of a plan to build the skill, the question you are actually asking is: will it always be this hard? Evian Johnson, 18, is walking into elementary classrooms across South Dakota with an answer backed by neuroscience that most parents never hear from the people in charge.
Miss South Dakota’s Teen was diagnosed with dyslexia at a young age. Now she reads dyslexia-themed books to young students and tells them something that happens to be true: their brains are not broken, and they are not finished. The science behind that statement goes further than awareness campaigns typically go, and parents deserve to know how far.
TL;DR
Evian Johnson, Miss South Dakota’s Teen 2026, visits elementary schools statewide with a dyslexia initiative called “Use Your Power,” reading books to kids and telling them their brains are not broken.
Brain-imaging research by Shaywitz (Yale) and Temple (Stanford) confirms children with dyslexia build the same neural reading pathways as typical readers after intensive, appropriate instruction.
The IDA’s 2025 definition explicitly moved dyslexia away from fixed and IQ-linked toward a multi-system, early-intervention framework.
Accommodations are a legitimate scaffold, but special education research documents the failure mode: supports that replace the expectation of skill-building create dependence, not capability.
Parents strengthen outcomes by building identity first, then asking schools specifically what reading instruction is actively building the underlying skill alongside any accommodation.
Miss South Dakota’s Teen is classroom-hopping across the state with a dyslexia message that the brain science backs. Here is what the evidence behind her initiative means for your child.
Common questions
Does dyslexia ever go away?
Dyslexia describes a difference in how the brain processes the sounds of language, and that underlying difference is real. But the science no longer supports “permanent.” Brain-imaging research by Shaywitz (Yale) and Temple (Stanford) shows that children with dyslexia develop the same neural reading networks as typical readers after intensive, appropriate instruction. The IDA’s 2025 definition explicitly moved away from the fixed, IQ-based model. The underlying processing difference persists, but its impact on reading skill is not fixed. A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations such as an IEP or 504 plan, or you suspect a vision, hearing, or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation; that is the only route to those supports.
Is extra test time enough support for a child with dyslexia?
Extended time removes processing speed as a barrier to demonstrating knowledge, which is a legitimate support. But it works best as a bridge while reading skill is actively being built through instruction, not as a long-term substitute for it. Special education research documents what happens when a support replaces the expectation that the underlying skill gets built: the incentive to develop that skill quietly disappears. The question worth asking alongside any accommodation: what specific reading instruction is targeting the root difficulty?
What kind of reading instruction actually helps kids with dyslexia?
Structured literacy, including systematic phonics and explicit decoding instruction, is the evidence-backed core, supported by the National Reading Panel and decades of replication. But reading draws on multiple processing systems, including working memory, processing speed, and auditory processing, not phonics alone. A child whose decoding is solid but whose reading still stalls often has a gap in one of those other systems. The most useful parent question for school: “What are you doing to build all the systems reading requires, not only decoding?”
How do I talk to my child about dyslexia without making them feel broken?
Start with what is accurate and hopeful: “Your brain processes sounds and letters differently, and the brain builds stronger reading pathways with the right practice.” That is not a platitude; it is what fMRI studies show. Avoid framing dyslexia as a permanent trait. The IDA’s 2025 definition moved specifically away from that model. A child who understands that difficulty is changeable engages with the hard work in a fundamentally different way.
Miss South Dakota’s Teen Takes Dyslexia Into the Classroom
Evian Johnson was crowned Miss South Dakota’s Teen in May 2026, bringing a community initiative she calls “Use Your Power.” The platform centers on dyslexia awareness. She visits elementary schools across the state, reading books where dyslexia is at the center: “Use Your Super Power,” which shows kids they are not alone, and “Courageous Cole,” a story about a child who learns to push through a reading struggle. The message she delivers is direct: learning differently is not a limitation.
Johnson will represent South Dakota at the Miss America’s Teen Competition in September 2026. Her initiative grew from experience: she was diagnosed with dyslexia at a young age. The books she reads and the conversations she opens are aimed at a specific problem: the isolation a child feels when reading is hard and no one around them explains why.
Coverage of Evian Johnson’s story rightly celebrates her dyslexia advocacy. The frame most reporting uses stops at visibility: a young person with dyslexia is sharing her story and telling other kids they are not alone. What that frame leaves out is the science she is pointing toward without stating it explicitly: brain-imaging research by Shaywitz (Yale) and Temple (Stanford) shows children with dyslexia develop the same neural reading pathways as typical readers after intensive, appropriate instruction. The IDA’s 2025 definition explicitly moved away from dyslexia as a fixed, IQ-linked condition. Awareness matters, but a parent whose child has dyslexia deserves to know the full evidence: the brain changes, and the primary lever alongside identity-building is evidence-based reading instruction, not just accommodation.
The Identity Message Is Doing Real Science
What Johnson is doing instinctively matches one of the most robust findings in educational psychology: identity-based motivation. Research by Carol Dweck and subsequent identity-based learning studies find that when children believe difficulty marks them as fundamentally broken, they disengage before they even try. A child who has written the sentence “I am bad at reading” into their own story about who they are will not bring the sustained effort that reading improvement requires. A teen standing in front of a classroom of struggling readers saying “you are not alone, and you are not broken” is interrupting that sentence. The neuroscience of motivation shows that interruption is a prerequisite, not a decoration.
The deeper science goes a step further than awareness. Brain-imaging research by Shaywitz et al. at Yale and Temple et al. at Stanford shows that children with reading difficulties, including dyslexia, develop the same neural reading pathways as typical readers after intensive, appropriate instruction. This is not metaphor. The brain physically rewires with sustained, structured practice. The International Dyslexia Association’s 2025 definition moved away from the old model of dyslexia as fixed and IQ-linked; the updated framework explicitly acknowledges that language and literacy support in the early school years is “particularly effective,” and that multi-system factors shape outcomes. The evidence now supports a higher bar than “learned to cope.”
The obstacle worth naming is a system that often tops out at accommodation: extended test time, text-to-speech, modified assignments. It rarely asks whether the underlying reading skill is being actively built alongside those supports. Accommodations are a legitimate scaffold. Special education’s own research describes how the right support, at the right moment, lifts a struggling learner more than it lifts anyone else. But the same research documents the failure mode: when a support is handed out because it is easier than addressing the actual gap, the incentive to build the underlying skill quietly disappears. The question parents deserve to be asking is whether the support their child receives is building the reading pathways, or substituting for the expectation that they get built.
Key Takeaways:
1
Identity changes how a child learns: Research shows children who believe reading difficulty is permanent disengage before instruction has a chance to work; Evian Johnson’s classroom visits address the prerequisite that makes intervention possible.
2
Dyslexia is not a fixed state: Brain-imaging research by Shaywitz (Yale) and Temple (Stanford) shows children with dyslexia build the same reading pathways as typical readers after intensive, appropriate instruction.
3
Accommodations scaffold; they do not replace skill-building: Extended time and text-to-speech support access while the brain rewires, but the underlying reading skill still needs active instruction targeting the root difficulty.
What to Do With This at Home and at School
Start with what Johnson is modeling. Before intensive reading instruction, before structured literacy sessions, a child needs to believe the effort has a destination. “Your brain is building stronger reading pathways” is not a platitude; it describes what fMRI studies now show happening in real time. Build that belief before anything else, because a child who has given up will not engage with the practice that drives the change.
From there, pair the identity work with instruction that actually builds the skill. Questions worth bringing to school: What specific reading instruction is my child receiving that targets phonological processing and decoding? What evidence-based program is in use, and how are we measuring actual reading fluency and accuracy growth, not accommodation use? If the school’s answer is primarily a list of accommodations rather than a description of explicit, systematic reading instruction, that is useful information about where to push next.
If you suspect dyslexia, a professional evaluation remains the route to formal accommodations including an IEP or 504 plan, and to ruling out vision, hearing, or other contributing factors. A screener tells you where to start today; it is a starting point, not a diagnosis, and it does not replace an evaluation if your child needs those supports.
Children who struggle to read are not short of awareness. What they are short of is the full truth: the brain they have today is not the brain they will have after a year of the right kind of effort, and no awareness campaign, however well-delivered, substitutes for the instruction that drives that change. The real obstacle is a system that defines success as a longer test and a text-to-speech tool when the evidence says the ceiling is much higher. Every parent who asks “what specific skill-building instruction is my child receiving?” is pushing against that system in the right direction. The Learning Success AI assessment shows you exactly which processing systems are holding your child back, so you know precisely what to ask for. Join All Access and get the complete roadmap.
Is Your Child Struggling in School?
Get Your FREE Personalized Learning Roadmap
Comprehensive assessment + instant access to research-backed strategies
Shaywitz et al. (Yale) + Temple et al. (Stanford) — fMRI studies of neural reading pathway development in children with dyslexia following structured intervention
International Dyslexia Association — 2025 Definition Update (multi-system causation; IQ-discrepancy requirement removed; early intervention mandate)
Dweck, Carol (Stanford) — Growth mindset and identity-based motivation research
