Research abstract

Say ‘no’ to DSA cuts

DSA suffers enough without having their funds cut even further. Advocation and foundations are not sufficient to keep many programs afloat. Are you willing to write a letter against DSA cuts? By Matthew Dodds

0dollarpexels-photo-164661
A group that is known as the Special Educational Consortium that focuses on the needs of students with disability has declared that the reforms that are now pending before parliament in regard to the Disabled Student’s Allowance are ill thought out and have failed to take into the special circumstances that these same students face.

Students receiving DSA are more likely to reach a first or upper class second honors degree than disabled students who do not receive an allowance.

The SEC sites particularly that the fact that disabled students have higher cost barriers when it comes to software and computer equipment. Beyond that wish legislators to remember that due t the circumstances of their conditions disabled students are more likely to come from lower income and also find matriculation in standard schools a more daunting challenge than the rest of the students.

Key takeaways

  1. Lord Low of Dalston in the Houses of Parliament is against any cuts to the program.
  2. The Special Educational Consortium (SEC) is fighting changes because in two months they have seen progress.
  3. The National Union of Students’ research shows that 55 percent of struggling students want to drop their courses.

Is your child struggling in school?

Get your free personalized learning roadmap

You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.

  • Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
  • Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
  • You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
  • Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly

Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.

Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.

Get my free assessment & 7-day trial Cancel anytime during your trial.

Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.

A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.

Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert Writes about the learning brain for parents who want plain answers. Every article is grounded in current neuroscience and classroom practice.