Understanding Why Interventions Seem to “Fail”

When your child’s reading intervention isn’t producing the results you hoped for, your first instinct might be to panic or assume the approach is wrong. But here’s what I’ve learned after working with thousands of families: most “failed” interventions aren’t actually program failures – they’re implementation puzzles waiting to be solved.

The biggest culprit? Implementation quality. Think about it like baking a cake. You could have the world’s best recipe, but if you use the wrong temperature, skip steps, or substitute ingredients, you won’t get the results you expect. The same principle applies to dyslexia interventions. Research shows that intervention fidelity – how closely the actual implementation matches the research protocol – dramatically affects outcomes.

Many parents don’t realize that the person delivering the intervention might not have adequate training in that specific approach. A reading specialist with general training is very different from someone certified in Orton-Gillingham or Wilson Reading. The difference in outcomes can be substantial. Your child isn’t broken – they might just need someone who truly understands how to deliver the intervention properly.

Timeline expectations also sabotage success. Our instant-gratification culture makes us expect reading improvements in weeks, but neuroplasticity – your child’s brain literally rewiring itself for reading – happens over months and years. The research is clear: meaningful changes in reading ability typically require 100-200 hours of intensive intervention. That translates to 6-12 months of consistent work, not 6-12 weeks.