The Ohio House of Representatives has effectively dismantled the state’s bipartisan Fair School Funding Plan, providing just $280 million in additional public school funding over the next two years while simultaneously increasing private school voucher spending by $432 million. This dramatic policy reversal will leave Ohio’s public schools $2.75 billion short of constitutionally required funding while dramatically expanding subsidies for private education.
Constitutional Crisis Deepens
Since 1997, when the Ohio Supreme Court declared the state’s school funding system unconstitutional, lawmakers have struggled to create an equitable funding formula. The Fair School Funding Plan, implemented in 2021 through bipartisan legislation, was designed to answer a fundamental question that had never been properly addressed: How much does it actually cost to educate a child in Ohio?
The FSFP was developed to address Ohio’s unconstitutional and inequitable school funding system by allocating resources based on local capacity to raise revenue and the actual cost of educating students, according to Policy Matters Ohio researcher Molly Bryden. The current legislative proposal abandons this evidence-based approach, returning instead to what education advocates call “residual budgeting,” where lawmakers determine how much they want to spend on schools and then work backward to create a per-pupil formula that matches that predetermined amount.
🚨 BREAKING: Ohio Legislature abandons Fair School Funding Plan, creating $2.75B shortfall for public schools while boosting private voucher spending by $432M. Policy reversal affects 1.6M students. #EducationFunding #Ohio #PublicEducation #SchoolChoice
Voucher Expansion Accelerates
While public school funding faces dramatic cuts, Ohio’s private school voucher programs are experiencing unprecedented growth. In the 2023-24 school year, Ohio gave out nearly 69,000 new EdChoice Expansion vouchers, while private school enrollment grew by fewer than 3,000 students, indicating that most vouchers went to families already attending private schools.
The voucher expansion has proven particularly beneficial to higher-income families. Only 17% of 2023-24 EdChoice Expansion recipients qualified as low-income, compared to 67% the previous year, highlighting how the program has shifted from supporting disadvantaged students to subsidizing families who were already choosing private education. The cost of Ohio’s five voucher programs reached $966.2 million for the 2023-24 school year—enough to fully fund the Fair School Funding Plan.
This policy shift represents a fundamental misunderstanding of how sustainable school improvement actually works—adequate, predictable funding is essential for implementing comprehensive educational reforms.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Educational Equity at Risk
From an educational leadership perspective, this policy shift represents a fundamental misunderstanding of how sustainable school improvement actually works. Research consistently shows that adequate, predictable funding is essential for implementing comprehensive educational reforms and maintaining high-quality programming through comprehensive educational system approaches.
The performance-based supplements included in the new budget create particularly troubling equity issues. Districts with the lowest student poverty levels and more community wealth are the beneficiaries of over two-thirds of state spending on the performance supplement component (67.1%), though they represent less than half of Ohio students (48.8%). This approach ignores the well-documented correlation between community economic conditions and school performance ratings.
Key takeaways
- $2.75 billion funding shortfall: Ohio public schools will receive $2.75 billion less than required under the Fair School Funding Plan over the next two years
- $432 million voucher expansion: Private school voucher spending increases dramatically while public school funding stagnates
- 94% voucher inefficiency: Of 69,000 new EdChoice Expansion vouchers, only 3,000 represented new private school enrollment
Implementation Challenges Ahead
The shift away from the Fair School Funding Plan creates significant uncertainty for district leaders attempting to plan budgets and programs. Now that the legislature has abandoned the FSFP entirely, state lawmakers wield more power to further dismantle Ohio’s public education funding in the next budget, making long-term strategic planning nearly impossible.
Education leaders will need to develop contingency plans for multiple funding scenarios while advocating for sustainable funding solutions. The unpredictability of residual budgeting makes it extremely difficult to implement multi-year improvement initiatives or make commitments to staffing and programming that require sustained investment. For comprehensive support of student learning outcomes, districts may be forced to increase their reliance on local property tax levies, further exacerbating inequities between wealthy and poor communities.
When funding is tied to performance metrics that strongly correlate with socioeconomic factors, the policy effectively penalizes schools serving the most vulnerable students.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
The situation in Ohio serves as a critical case study for other states grappling with similar tensions between school choice expansion and public education funding adequacy. As more states consider similar approaches, the long-term impact on student outcomes and educational equity will provide important data for policymakers nationwide. For comprehensive analysis of education policy trends and their implications for school leaders, explore our All Access Program.
See what All Access gives your child
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.
References
- Policy Matters Ohio - Fair School Funding Analysis
- Policy Matters Ohio - Legislative Abandonment Report
- Policy Matters Ohio - Voucher Expansion Analysis
- Ohio House Leadership - Speaker's Office 614-466-8842
- Policy Matters Ohio - Hannah Halbert, Executive Director
- Ohio Education Association - Scott DiMauro, President
- Ohio Department of Education and Workforce - Communications Office
