
What does an unlucky penny and math have in common? Do you have a guess? I couldn’t seem to put the two together until after reading this article. An unlucky penny and bad ideas are something that keeps coming back according to this author, in fact the bad idea is the constant revamping of math ideas and how to teach math.
Whether Common Core or the ‘old fashioned’ math, it has remained an elusive subject.
Common Core is teaching students while reteaching teachers.
It seems that the new way of doing math or the common core standard as many schools have taken to calling this new way of doing math, suggests that we teach math by teaching how to find the answer rather than just the manipulation of numbers. To learn more about the common core and how this author finds it as just another bad idea when it comes to teaching math, read more in this article.
When learning a new skill, it’s best to master a single, simple approach before being exposed to other more complex methods. Otherwise, you run the risk of confusion, frustration and ultimately not learning how to solve the problem.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Key takeaways
- Common Core math aims to fix problems in the way students are learning math, but is full of problems itself.
- Requiring students to pursue alternate options of solving problems can lead to confusion.
- Common Core math resembles a math model in the 1960’s called “New Math” that was a complete failure, and so it should be revised.
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.



