California’s Reading Gains Show Struggling Readers Were Never the Problem
Last updated:
For years the standard answer to a child who struggled with reading was worry, wait, and see. California now has numbers that point somewhere better: 46% of the state’s fourth graders read at grade level, up from 40% in 2014, and new research ties the gains to districts that spent state grants on literacy coaches and on training teachers in evidence-based reading instruction. Notice what actually moved. The children did not change; the teaching did. That distinction matters for every parent who has watched a capable child battle a page and wondered what was wrong.
TL;DR
California fourth graders reading at grade level rose from 40% in 2014 to 46% in 2025 on state tests; the state ranked 47th nationally in 2013.
PPIC research found districts using state grants for literacy coaches, reading specialists, or teacher training scored about 6 points higher within two years.
42% of California districts report difficulty hiring qualified literacy coaches; Lassen County gained more than 7 points after one week of summer teacher training.
Under SB 114, every California K-2 student is screened annually for reading-difficulty risk starting in 2025-26, with parent notice, a written opt-out, and results within 45 days.
Mississippi rose from 49th (2013) to 9th (2024) in national fourth grade reading after retraining teachers in the science of reading.
California’s reading scores are rising, and the gains follow a pattern every parent should understand: they showed up where schools changed how reading is taught. Here is what the numbers show and what the new K-2 screening rollout means for your family.
Common questions
What is California's new dyslexia screening requirement?
Under Senate Bill 114, every public school student in kindergarten through second grade is screened each year for risk of reading difficulties, starting no later than the 2025-26 school year. Parents receive written notice at least 15 days ahead, are able to opt out in writing, and get results with interpretation help within 45 days. Results are barred from high-stakes uses such as holding a child back.
My child was flagged as at risk. Does that mean dyslexia?
No. A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. A flag means your child shows risk indicators worth acting on now, while the reading brain is most responsive to the right practice. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing, or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too; that is the only route to those supports.
What should I ask my child's school about reading instruction?
Ask which approved screener the district chose, what specific evidence-based instruction follows a flagged result, and whether the school has put literacy funds into a coach or teacher training. California's data shows scores rose where instruction changed, so instruction is the thing to ask about.
Are California's reading gains real?
Yes, with context. Fourth graders reading at grade level rose from 40% in 2014 to 46% in 2025 on state tests, and PPIC research found districts investing in coaches and training scored about 6 points higher within two years. California still sits mid-pack nationally, so there is distance left to cover.
In 2013, California ranked 47th in the nation in fourth grade reading, with 27% of students scoring proficient or better on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The state responded over the following decade: a 2014 English language arts framework that put phonics-based instruction back at the center, $500 million in grants for literacy coaches and reading support in 2023, another $215 million in 2024, and $350 million more in the current budget. Phonics-based instruction became mandatory in 2025, and a statewide dyslexia screening requirement is rolling out now. By 2025, 46% of fourth graders read at grade level on state tests, and California sits mid-pack nationally instead of near the bottom.
Research from the Public Policy Institute of California, reported July 20 by CalMatters, found that nearly 60% of districts used their grant money to hire literacy coaches, add reading specialists, or train teachers. Districts that made those moves saw students score roughly 6 points higher on state tests within two years, with gains extending to English learners. “They’ve absolutely had a positive impact. But we have an opportunity to do an even better job,” said PPIC researcher Sarah Novicoff.
Tracy Elementary in Baldwin Park shows what that looks like on the ground. The school serves mostly low-income families, with more than 30% English learners. After hiring literacy coach Claudia Barba, reading scores jumped more than 10 percentage points in two years, and chronic absenteeism fell from 44% to 11%. “Literacy is the key to everything. If a child can read, they can access knowledge. They start to enjoy school. They can get a better education,” said principal Laura Rodriguez.
Author Quote"
They’ve absolutely had a positive impact. But we have an opportunity to do an even better job.
"
What the coverage gets wrong
Most reporting frames California's gains as proof that education spending pays off. The state's own data says something more precise: the dollars that worked were the ones that changed instruction. Districts that turned grants into literacy coaches and science-of-reading teacher training gained about 6 points in two years, the 42% of districts that could not hire saw far less movement, and one rural county earned a 7-point jump from a single week of teacher training. Decades of cognitive science, from the National Reading Panel to Keith Rayner's eye-movement research, show reading has to be explicitly taught. For a parent, the useful question is not how much a school spends. It is how the school teaches reading.
The gains followed the teaching, not the dollars
The easy headline is that spending worked. Look closer and the pattern is sharper: scores moved where the money changed how reading is taught, and stalled where it could not. Forty-two percent of districts reported trouble hiring literacy coaches, and remote counties saw little movement as a result. Meanwhile Lassen County sidestepped the hiring problem, paid teachers to attend one week of summer training in 2023, and watched reading scores climb more than 7 percentage points. Same dollars, different outcomes, one variable: whether instruction actually changed.
This is exactly what reading science predicts. Humans evolved to absorb spoken language, but reading is a cultural invention the brain never evolved for, which is why researchers from Stanislas Dehaene to Maryanne Wolf conclude it has to be explicitly taught. The National Reading Panel reached the same conclusion in 2000. Yet for decades many classrooms taught children to guess words from pictures and context, an approach Keith Rayner’s eye-movement research showed is how struggling readers read, not skilled ones; cognitive scientist Mark Seidenberg describes three-cueing as descriptive of how poor readers read. States only began correcting course after Emily Hanford’s 2019 investigation Sold a Story made the failure public.
Mississippi ran this experiment first. In 2013 it ranked 49th in fourth grade reading; by 2024 it ranked 9th, and a peer-reviewed causal study estimates its Literacy-Based Promotion Act raised average fourth grade NAEP reading scores by about 5 points. The recipe was the one now working in California: train teachers in the science of reading, put coaches beside them, and screen children early. Brain imaging from Yale and Stanford explains why it works: with the right intervention, children who struggle with reading develop the same reading pathways as typical readers. The brain physically rewires. The obstacle was never the children. It was instruction built on the myth that reading develops naturally.
Key Takeaways:
1
Instruction moved the needle: Districts turning grants into coaches and teacher training gained 6 points in two years.
2
Reading is taught, not caught: Decades of science show reading never develops naturally; explicit teaching rewires the brain.
3
Screening reaches every K-2 child: California parents get advance notice, a written opt-out, and results within 45 days.
What this means for your child
If you have a child in a California elementary school, the screening piece arrives on your doorstep first. Starting with the 2025-26 school year, every kindergartner through second grader is screened annually for risk of reading difficulties under Senate Bill 114. You get written notice at least 15 days before the screening, the option to opt out in writing, and results within 45 days along with help interpreting them. The law bars schools from using results for high-stakes decisions like holding a child back.
Used well, this is the opposite of the old wait-to-fail model, and the International Dyslexia Association’s 2025 definition update is explicit that literacy support before and during the early school years is particularly effective. The risk is what happens to the words. A screener result is a flashlight, not a verdict: it tells you where to look, today, while your child’s reading brain is still wiring itself. Treat a risk flag as a starting signal for the right kind of practice, never as a fixed identity for your child.
Three questions turn this news into action at any school, in any state: Which screener does our district use? What specific instruction follows a flagged result? Has our school put literacy funds into a coach or teacher training? California’s numbers show scores follow instruction. Parents who ask about instruction, not budgets, are asking the question that predicts whether their child’s school will move.
Author Quote"
I’d love to hire a literacy coach. It’s great the state is offering the money, but we just can’t do it. We don’t have the capacity.
"
Every child in this story was capable the whole time; what changed was the method the adults used. The villain was never a struggling reader, and it was never a teacher either. It is the idea that reading develops naturally, an idea that left generations of capable children guessing at words while everyone waited for a bloom that was never coming. You hold more power here than any budget line: the science that moved California’s scores works at a kitchen table too. The Learning Success All Access program builds the underlying skills reading depends on, with a free trial and a personalized Action Plan you keep either way.
Is Your Child Struggling in School?
Get Your FREE Personalized Learning Roadmap
Comprehensive assessment + instant access to research-backed strategies
