A recent study from the University of Alberta has made a remarkable discovery about the connection between our mouths and our brains when it comes to reading. By temporarily reducing oral sensory input, researchers found that proficient adults showed significant improvements in their reading performance and neural activity.
Introduction to the Study
The study, led by PhD candidate Mitchell Holmes and supervised by Jacqueline Cummine, aimed to explore the relationship between mouth sensation and reading. Participants were asked to perform reading tasks under different conditions, including with and without oral sensory input.
New study reveals surprising link between mouth sensation & reading ability! What does this mean for dyslexia & reading difficulties? Learn more about the groundbreaking research and its implications for literacy instruction.
Methodology and Findings
The researchers used a combination of behavioral and neuroimaging techniques to assess the impact of oral sensory input on reading performance. The results showed that reducing oral sensory input led to faster reading times and improved accuracy, as well as changes in neural activity in areas responsible for reading and speech processing.
The study’s findings have significant implications for our understanding of dyslexia and reading difficulties, and highlight the need for a more nuanced and multifaceted approach to reading instruction and intervention.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Implications for Dyslexia and Reading Difficulties
The study’s findings have important implications for our understanding of dyslexia and other reading difficulties. By highlighting the critical role of mouth sensation in reading, the research suggests new avenues for the development of targeted interventions and treatments.
Key takeaways
- Key Finding: Reducing oral sensory input improves reading performance in proficient adults.Methodology: Combination of behavioral and neuroimaging techniques used to assess reading performance and neural activity.Implications: Study's findings have important implications for understanding dyslexia and developing targeted interventions.
Future Directions and Conclusion
While the study’s results are promising, further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between mouth sensation and reading. Nevertheless, the findings offer a hopeful perspective for individuals struggling with reading difficulties and underscore the importance of continued research into the complex and multifaceted nature of reading and literacy.
In conclusion, the study’s findings underscore the complex and multifaceted nature of reading and literacy, highlighting the need for continued research into the intricate relationships between our senses, brain, and reading ability. By embracing this complexity and pursuing innovative approaches to reading instruction and intervention, we can work towards creating a more inclusive and supportive learning environment for all individuals, regardless of their reading abilities.
For those interested in learning more about the study and its implications, the Learning Success All Access Program offers a wealth of resources and information on reading development, dyslexia, and literacy instruction. With a free trial and personalized Action Plan, individuals can take the first step towards unlocking their full reading potential and achieving success in all areas of life. Learning Success All Access Program
See what All Access gives your child
Take the dyslexia test
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.
References
- Original Study
