A federal judge has temporarily blocked the administration’s new admissions data requirement, extending the deadline to March 25 in a suit by 17 states. This decision comes as a response to the lawsuit filed by the states, arguing that the demand is unlawful and places a considerable burden on institutions.
Background on the ACTS Survey
The ACTS survey is a new component of the U.S. Department of Education’s Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), requiring colleges to collect extensive admissions data on test scores, grade point averages, race, sex, and income ranges of applied, admitted, and enrolled students going back as far as 2019.
Federal judge blocks new admissions data requirement, extending deadline to March 25. What does this mean for higher education? #EducationPolicy #HigherEd
States’ Argument Against the Requirement
The 17 state attorneys general who filed the lawsuit argue that the demand is unlawful and transforms IPEDS from a reliable tool for methodical statistical reporting into a mechanism for law enforcement and the furthering of partisan policy aims. They also claim that the scope and time frame of collecting such data place a considerable burden on institutions and could subject them to costly investigations based on unreliable data.
The administration’s demand for admissions data is unlawful and places a considerable burden on institutions.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Implications of the Temporary Block
The temporary restraining order issued by U.S. District Judge Dennis Saylor IV in Boston extends the deadline through March 25 to permit a hearing and orderly resolution of the issues. This decision may have significant implications for the administration’s efforts to collect and report admissions data, potentially delaying or altering the implementation of the ACTS survey.
Key takeaways
- Federal Judge Blocks New Admissions Data Requirement: A temporary restraining order has been issued, extending the deadline to March 25.States' Argument: The demand is unlawful and places a considerable burden on institutions.Implications: The decision may delay or alter the implementation of the ACTS survey.
Looking Ahead
As the lawsuit proceeds, it is essential for educational institutions and stakeholders to stay informed about the developments and potential outcomes. The resolution of this case may set a precedent for future data collection and reporting requirements in higher education, affecting how institutions approach admissions and student data management.
This development underscores the ongoing debate about the role of data collection in higher education and the balance between institutional burden and the need for informed policy decisions. As the case unfolds, it is crucial for stakeholders to engage in discussions about the implications of such requirements on educational institutions and students. Learn more about how Learning Success supports educational institutions and students.
See what All Access gives your child
See MTSS for schools
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.
References
