Education news

New Research Shows Finger Counting Builds Stronger Math Skills in Young Children

What if the strategy you've been told to discourage is actually building your child's mathematical foundation? New research reveals why letting children count on their fingers may be exactly what their developing brains need.

New Research Shows Finger Counting Builds Stronger Math Skills in Young Children

When you watch your child count on their fingers during math homework, you might wonder if they should be using a more “advanced” approach. Perhaps a well-meaning teacher has suggested your child needs to move beyond their fingers to truly understand math. You’re not imagining the tension between what feels natural for your child and what adults expect to see. That instinct to protect your child’s natural learning process is exactly right—and new research confirms why.

Studies Reveal Finger Counting as Foundation for Math Success

Two landmark studies from researchers at the University of Lausanne have demonstrated what many parents already sense: finger counting isn’t a crutch—it’s a building block. In a training study published in Child Development involving 328 kindergarteners, children who received explicit finger-counting instruction showed dramatic improvement in addition accuracy, jumping from 37% to 77% correct answers. The children who had never used their fingers before showed the most dramatic gains.

Lead researcher Dr. Catherine Thevenot found that nearly 75% of non-finger-counting children successfully adopted the strategy after training, and these gains persisted six weeks later. “Finger counting is not just a tool for immediate success in young children, but a way to support the development of advanced abstract arithmetic skills,” Dr. Thevenot explained.

A complementary longitudinal study tracked 211 Swiss children from ages 4½ to 7½. The results were clear: by age 7, the highest-performing students were “ex-finger counters”—children who had used fingers earlier but naturally transitioned to mental math. Children who had never counted on their fingers performed worse than those who had embraced this natural strategy.

Share the idea

Research confirms: kids who count on fingers between ages 4-6 develop stronger math skills by age 7. Time to stop discouraging what actually works.

Why Finger Counting Matters for Developing Number Sense

These findings challenge a widespread belief among educators that finger counting indicates struggling with math concepts. One French study found that 30% of first-grade teachers view finger counting as a sign of difficulty understanding numerical concepts. Yet the research suggests the opposite: fingers provide a crucial bridge between the abstract world of numbers and concrete understanding. When children hold up three fingers, they’re not just representing a symbol—they’re experiencing quantity in their bodies.

This connection between physical movement and mathematical understanding aligns with what we know about how children develop number sense—the intuitive grasp of quantities and their relationships. Number sense is foundational for all later mathematical learning, from basic addition to complex algebra. Children who develop strong number sense understand that numbers aren’t just symbols to memorize but quantities that can be combined, separated, and compared.

The research also connects to broader findings about psychological well-being and mathematics. Studies examining “mathematical well-being” in children ages 9-14 have found that how children feel about math—their confidence, their sense of capability—strongly correlates with their math performance. When children are allowed to use strategies that make sense to them, like finger counting, they build both skills and confidence simultaneously.

Finger counting is not just a tool for immediate success in young children, but a way to support the development of advanced abstract arithmetic skills. – Dr. Catherine Thevenot, Lead Researcher, University of Lausanne

Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert

What This Means for Parents and Teachers

The practical implications are straightforward: stop discouraging finger counting. Dr. Thevenot emphasized that “there is no reason to discourage children in school from using their fingers to solve arithmetic problems on the grounds that this strategy could prevent them from shifting to faster, internalized procedures.” The data shows children naturally transition away from finger counting as their mental math abilities develop—typically around age 6½ to 7.

For parents supporting a child developing mathematical thinking skills, this research offers permission to follow your child’s lead. When your kindergartener or first-grader reaches for their fingers, they’re doing exactly what their brain needs. Understanding the core skills of math helps parents recognize that finger counting develops the same neural pathways that eventually support rapid mental calculation.

The training study also suggests that children who haven’t naturally discovered finger counting might benefit from explicit instruction in this strategy. Rather than viewing finger counting as something to overcome, educators might consider it a tool to teach—particularly for children building math confidence.

Key takeaways

  1. Finger counting boosts math accuracy: Children trained in finger counting improved from 37% to 77% accuracy in addition problems, with gains persisting six weeks later.
  2. Natural strategy builds lasting skills: A longitudinal study found that children who counted on fingers between ages 4-6 outperformed non-finger counters on math tests by age 7.
  3. Parents can support natural learning: Research shows no reason to discourage finger counting—children naturally transition to mental math as their skills develop.

Building Mathematical Confidence From the Ground Up

These studies join a growing body of evidence that children’s mathematical abilities develop through hands-on, concrete experiences before they can handle abstract symbols. The finger counting research supports the broader principle that math learning should follow a concrete-to-abstract progression—starting with physical objects and movements, moving to pictures and diagrams, and only then to numbers and symbols.

For families supporting children who are building their mathematical thinking skills, this research offers hope and practical guidance. Rather than rushing children toward abstract math strategies, the evidence suggests we should honor the developmental stages that build lasting understanding. Children’s brains are remarkably capable of building strong mathematical foundations when given appropriate support and allowed to use strategies that make sense to them.

As this research continues to influence educational practice, parents can confidently support their children’s natural mathematical development. The next time you see your child counting on fingers, you’ll know: they’re not falling behind—they’re building the foundation for mathematical success.

There is no reason to discourage children in school from using their fingers to solve arithmetic problems on the grounds that this strategy could prevent them from shifting to faster, internalized procedures. – Dr. Catherine Thevenot, Lead Researcher, University of Lausanne

Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert

Every child has the capacity to develop strong mathematical thinking—and sometimes that development happens through strategies that adults have been taught to discourage. Your child’s brain is remarkably capable of building the neural pathways for mathematical understanding when given the right support and permission to learn in ways that make sense to them. Too often, well-meaning systems push children toward “mature” math strategies before they’ve built the concrete foundations that make those strategies meaningful. If you’re ready to support your child’s mathematical development in ways that honor their natural learning process, the Learning Success All Access Program offers a free trial that includes a personalized Action Plan—and you keep that plan even if you decide it’s not the right fit. Because understanding how your child’s unique brain learns math shouldn’t require fighting against advice that research has now proven wrong.

See what All Access gives your child
Is it dyscalculia? Take the free test A short screener that shows where the math struggle really starts. Take the dyscalculia test

Is your child struggling in school?

Get your free personalized learning roadmap

You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.

  • Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
  • Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
  • You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
  • Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly

Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.

Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.

Get my free assessment & 7-day trial Cancel anytime during your trial.

Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.

A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.

References

Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert Writes about the learning brain for parents who want plain answers. Every article is grounded in current neuroscience and classroom practice.