If you’ve watched your child fall further behind in reading while the school says they’re “monitoring the situation,” you know the special kind of frustration that comes from feeling invisible in a system that’s supposed to help. You’ve probably filled out forms, attended meetings, and still found yourself wondering if anyone is actually listening. That instinct that something needs to change isn’t paranoia—it’s the reality that families across New York City are living right now, even after years of promises that things would get better.
Promises Meet Reality in Nation’s Largest School System
Three years after Mayor Eric Adams pledged to transform how New York City schools identify and support children developing reading skills, advocates and families say the system still falls dramatically short. According to interviews with more than a dozen parents, disability advocates, and special education lawyers, the city has failed to deliver on both its promises and its legal obligations under federal law to provide equal education for every child with reading differences.
Adams, whose own reading differences went undiagnosed until college, had made this issue deeply personal. He spoke of fearing being called on to read aloud in his public school classes and promised to turn the nation’s largest school system into a model for finding and serving children like him. The city did achieve some wins—launching two specialized literacy academies, increasing attention to the issue, and joining a broader national movement toward phonics-based instruction rooted in brain science.
Yet the gap between announcement and implementation has left many families caught in the same struggles they faced before. One mother, Ara Calcano, spent more than two years, dozens of hours of meetings, and eventually hired a lawyer just to get help for her son, who was barely reading above kindergarten level by third grade. Her experience reflects what advocates call a “piecemeal approach” that helps some children while leaving thousands of others without support.
$1.1 billion. That's what NYC spent reimbursing families when schools failed their kids with reading differences. Meanwhile, parents are still fighting alone.
The Cost of Waiting Extends Far Beyond Academics
The stakes for children who don’t receive appropriate reading support are difficult to overstate. Research consistently shows that with targeted instruction, children with reading differences can become confident, capable readers. Their brains literally reorganize and form new neural pathways when given the right input. But when that support never arrives, children join the ranks of the one in five U.S. adults who struggle with functional literacy—unable to easily read medical prescriptions, job applications, or transit schedules. Understanding how reading differences affect processing can help parents recognize what their children actually need.
Reading differences affect an estimated 5 to 20 percent of students, making them the most common learning difference in schools. Yet children are often never identified and regularly denied help. Of the 1,500 New York City students who received secondary screening last year, 95 percent were identified as needing additional support—suggesting schools already knew which children needed help but lacked systems to provide it.
The financial toll is staggering as well. When public schools fail to serve students, families may sue for private school placement and tuition reimbursement. These cases have cost New York City more than $1.1 billion in recent years, with wealthier families fronting tuition of $75,000 or more while low-income families often go without any specialized support at all.
No one should be declaring victory. There’s still a long way to go and a lot of work left to do. Our school system is still far from the point where students with reading differences can count on getting the level of support they need to be successful readers. – Sarah Part, Senior Policy Analyst at Advocates for Children of New York
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Parent Advocacy Remains the Difference Maker
The story of NYC’s reading support gaps offers a clear lesson: parents who advocate relentlessly often get results, while those without time, resources, or knowledge of the system watch their children fall further behind. This pattern repeats across the country, where families in districts everywhere face the same frustrations. The research on parent advocacy and educational outcomes consistently shows that informed, persistent parents can change trajectories—but they shouldn’t have to fight so hard.
Some parents have seen remarkable progress through the city’s small pilot programs. Naomi Peña, who helped push for the literacy academies, notes that enrolled children often rapidly gain confidence. They walk taller, feel smarter, and stop using words like “I’m dumb.” These transformations demonstrate what’s possible when children receive appropriate support—their brains respond to targeted instruction with remarkable plasticity.
Even critics acknowledge that Adams helped reduce stigma around reading differences. Brooklyn Assemblyman Robert Carroll, who has reading differences himself and was once a vocal supporter, notes that finally saying the word “dyslexia” publicly represents a meaningful shift. But he also became sharply critical of the administration’s follow-through, arguing that the mayor’s legal troubles became a distraction that prevented real systemic change.
Key takeaways
- $1.1 billion spent on legal battles: NYC has spent over a billion dollars reimbursing families for private school tuition when public schools failed to serve their children with reading differences.
- 95% of screened students needed help: Among the 1,500 students who received secondary reading assessments, nearly all were identified as needing additional support, revealing massive unmet need.
- Parent advocacy changes outcomes: Families who persistently advocate for their children often see dramatic improvements, while those without resources or knowledge see their children fall further behind.
What Families Can Do While Systems Catch Up
For families navigating these challenges right now, waiting for school systems to improve isn’t a realistic option. The good news is that parents can take action today without depending on bureaucratic timelines. Early identification remains crucial—children whose reading differences are recognized and addressed early show dramatically better outcomes than those who wait years for formal intervention.
The incoming mayoral administration will inherit both the unfinished work and the billion-dollar price tag of failing to serve children well. Advocates are calling for more intensive teacher training, expanded screening programs, and dedicated support for middle and high school students who remain especially underserved. Whatever happens at the policy level, families can begin with understanding their child’s specific reading profile and building skills at home while advocating for appropriate school support.
The science is clear: brains change when given the right input. Children who struggle with reading today can become confident readers tomorrow when they receive targeted, evidence-based support. The question isn’t whether improvement is possible—it’s whether systems will move fast enough to reach children before they internalize the belief that they simply can’t learn.
The fact that we’re finally saying the word ‘dyslexia’ is massive. They’re walking taller, they feel smarter, they’re not using words like ‘I’m dumb.’ – Naomi Peña, Mother of four public school children with reading differences
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Every child’s brain is capable of learning to read. The science on this is unequivocal—given the right input, neural pathways reorganize, connections strengthen, and reading skills develop. What’s also clear is that waiting for bureaucratic systems to figure this out means watching children internalize the belief that they’re somehow broken. The real villain here isn’t individual teachers or even mayors with good intentions—it’s a system that labels children rather than develops them, that manages paperwork rather than builds skills. If you’re tired of waiting for a system that wasn’t designed for your child, the Learning Success All Access Program offers a free trial that includes a personalized Action Plan—and you keep that plan even if you decide it’s not the right fit.
See what All Access gives your child
See MTSS for schools
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.
References
- New York Times - Eric Adams Pledged to Help Dyslexic Students. Many Say He Fell Short
- Frontiers in Public Health - School-based Screening Tools for Dyslexia Review
- Education Week - New Dyslexia Definition and School Implications
