
Small group instruction may be the key to improving math learning and abilities for many students. Small group allows for a higher teacher to student ratio and fosters learning new concepts more quickly. In large classrooms there are oftentimes pockets of children who fall through the cracks and don’t learn as effectively as their peers.
Two teachers are using their grant to prove small groups benefit students.
Two Maize teachers are hoping to use a $10,000 grant they have received to implement a small group strategy at Pray-Woodman school. They hope that they can inspire other teachers at their school to be on board with the new strategy that will help reach all students and give them increased chances at effective learning.
You can’t pull five or six students aside for a math lesson while 20 others just fend for themselves. It takes creativity, planning and a willingness to experiment with activities students can do on their own.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Key takeaways
- For most children, small-group instruction, particularly in mathematics, is more effective than traditional whole-class approaches.
- A grant from a Virginia-based non-profit organization will allow more small-group instruction and personal intervention in mathematics instruction at the Pray-Woodman Elementary School.
- Most of the grant will be used to pay for substitute teachers to monitor classrooms while the primary teachers interact with the small mathematics groups.
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.



