The letter arrives on ordinary paper, in ordinary type. In one paragraph, it undoes a month of hope. Your child does not meet the criteria for an assessment, it reads. As if a child who struggles through every school day were a form filled out wrong, and not a child who needs help. If being told your worry is not big enough to count has worn you down, you are in enormous company. Thousands of families hear a version of that same no every year. Almost none of them are told what the law actually says next.
FROM THE VIDEO
Key moments from Navigating EHCP for Dyslexia, with a special-educational-needs advocate:
Common questions from parents
The school says my child is making good progress, so we do not qualify. Is that true?
What is the difference between an EHCP and an IEP?
Do I need a formal diagnosis before I request an assessment?
What do I do if the assessment is refused?
The school said your child does not qualify for support. In 2023 to 2024, about 99% of families who appealed and reached a hearing won. The refusal letter counts on you not knowing that.
That “No” Is Usually a Gate, Not a Verdict
The refusal tends to arrive dressed in official reasons. Your child is making adequate progress. The school already has the resources. Three more terms of monitoring are needed. A psychologist has not seen them yet. Each one lands like a closed door.
In England, the plan is called an Education, Health and Care Plan. The legal test for whether an assessment happens is simpler than those letters imply. If a child has, or might have, special educational needs, the local authority has a duty to assess. The child only has to be someone who might need support beyond the ordinary. Most of the reasons families are handed do not clear that bar. Few of them would survive a challenge.
The pattern is not unique to Britain. In the United States, the parallel is an IEP or a 504 plan under IDEA. The same gatekeeping shows up there too. A child does not have to be failing outright to hold the right to an evaluation. Different country, same quiet message to worn-down parents. And the same law waiting behind it.
Here are the reasons that sound final and often are not:
- “Your child is making good academic progress”
- “The school has the resources to meet these needs”
- “We need three more terms of assess, plan, do, and review”
- “Your child has not been seen by an educational psychologist”
None of those is the legal test. Progress that looks fine on a spreadsheet hides a lot. It says nothing about a child working twice as hard as classmates to stay afloat. And “the school will manage” is a hope, not a plan a family is able to hold anyone to.
A child who struggles through every school day is not a form filled out wrong. They are a child the law already agreed to protect.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
Why a Legal Right Feels Like a Fight
If the right exists, why does claiming it feel like a war? The honest answer is money. The number of children with additional needs has climbed for years. The budgets meant to meet them have shrunk. A refusal at the front door is one way a stretched authority protects a stretched budget.
Schools in England fund the first slice of support themselves. It is often quoted as a notional 6,000 pounds per pupil. Many head teachers say that money is already spent. The result is close to a postcode lottery. The same child would be assessed in one borough and turned away in the next.
Here is the part the letters never mention. When families appeal, they overwhelmingly win. In 2023 to 2024, about 99 percent of England tribunal appeals decided at a full hearing went the family’s way. Roughly a quarter of all appeals that year challenged a refusal to even assess. Most authorities concede before a hearing rather than defend a decision they know will not hold.
Special education research has a name for the right support at the right moment. It is called a differential boost. It lifts a struggling learner more than it lifts anyone else in the room. The heartbreak is who receives it. The boost reaches the families who knew to push. It slips past the ones who were told no and believed it. That gap is not a science problem. It is a systems problem, and its solution costs a parent knowledge rather than money.
Key takeaways
- The bar is lower than it sounds: A duty to assess is triggered by a possible need, not a severe one.
- Appeals overwhelmingly win: Roughly 99 percent of full hearings in 2023 to 2024 went the family’s way.
- Paperwork is leverage: A written request and an independent assessment are a parent’s strongest tools.
What to Do the Week After a Refusal
Start by putting your request in writing. Keep every reply. A paper trail is the single strongest thing a parent brings to a dispute. If the first answer is no, find your deadline to challenge it. In England you have two months from the decision letter to appeal to the SEND Tribunal. In the United States, the clock and the route run through your district’s dispute process. Read the notice you were sent, and diary the date the moment it lands.
Where your budget allows, commission an independent specialist assessment. A private evaluation carries real weight. It spells out in plain terms the support your child needs. It is hard for a school or a panel to wave away. And do not underestimate your own standing at that table. You do not need a credential to be the most important advocate your child will ever have. You are the most consistent expert in the room. You have watched the struggle up close and across years. That is exactly the perspective a table full of professionals is missing.
Still gathering evidence? A free dyslexia screener is a useful place to start building your own picture at home. One caution, stated plainly: a screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. For formal support such as an EHCP, an IEP, or a 504 plan, a professional evaluation is the route. The same is true if you suspect a vision, hearing, or medical cause. The screener tells you where to start today. The formal assessment secures what the law owes your child tomorrow.
You do not need a credential to be your child’s most important advocate. You need the one legal test a refusal letter hopes you never read.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
You want the same thing that letter is standing between you and: a child who walks into school able to keep up, and who holds onto the belief that they are a capable learner along the way. The obstacle was never your child’s effort. It is a system that turned a legal right into an obstacle course, betting that tired parents stop running it. You are the one who breaks that pattern, not the school and not the diagnosis. The people who spend the most hours watching your child struggle and succeed are not the ones writing the policy. They are the ones reading this sentence right now.
While you push for the plan, keep building the skill underneath it at home, where a few focused minutes a day add up faster than most families expect. The 5-Minute Reading Fix is built for exactly that kind of steady, low-pressure practice.
And a reading struggle rarely travels alone. Most children who find reading hard also wrestle with attention, working memory, or the confidence that erodes after years of being told to try harder. Building those underlying skills together is the point of All Access, so the support you fight to secure at school has something strong to stand on at home.
See what All Access gives your child
Take the dyslexia test
Is your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.
