
In 2006, Roediger and Karpicke compared rereading a passage with being tested on it. Rereading won on a quiz right away. Days later, the tested students remembered more. Maybe your child reread the chapter three times and still went blank. To us, that is not a child who didn’t try, and you are not alone.
FROM THE VIDEO
Key moments from the International Classroom Podcast with Brad, a chartered psychologist at InnerDrive:
Common questions from parents
Is rereading notes a good way to study?
What is retrieval practice?
Is cramming the night before a test a bad idea?
Does my child study better with music on?
Your child reread the chapter three times and still blanked. In 2006, rereading lost to a simpler habit days later. The swap to try at homework tonight.
Why does rereading feel like studying when it does not stick?
Rereading feels good. The words look familiar, so it feels like knowing. Highlighting feels good too. Brad, a chartered psychologist at InnerDrive, calls this the illusion of learning. “Look how many colors I’ve highlighted,” says the student he pictures.
His number one rule fits in one line. “The harder you think about something, the more likely you are to remember it,” Brad says. Rereading, highlighting and copying notes run on autopilot. They feel like progress. They ask for little thinking. That is how a child studies for an hour, feels ready, and then blanks. The feeling of knowing was real. The memory behind it was thin.
Here is the catch. We are poor judges of what helps us learn. Brad says students’ instincts are “almost the opposite” of what works. His own child would pick chocolate-chip cookies for breakfast. Wanting something does not make it good for you. “Most people self-select easy and fun stuff because learning is difficult,” he says.
The words look familiar, so it feels like knowing.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
What should we do at the kitchen table instead?
Swap looking for remembering. Close the book and ask questions. Let your child pull the answer out of memory before checking. This is called retrieval practice. Here are four easy ways in:
- Ask three questions out loud after each section.
- Turn notes into flashcards, with a question on the front.
- Do practice questions or an old test with the book shut.
- For spelling, have your child write the word from memory, not copy it again.
It will feel harder than rereading. Answers come slowly, and some are wrong. That slow, hard part is the thinking Brad means. Check the answer together, then ask again later.
Next, spread it out. Short sessions across several days beat one long night of cramming. Cepeda and colleagues reviewed a large set of experiments in 2006 and found that pattern. The longer your child needs to remember something, the bigger the best gap gets. We hold both habits as a strong direction, not a promise for every child. Our spaced and retrieval practice guide says what the studies did and did not test. This study habits infographic puts it on one page.
Start small. Brad calls research “a compass,” not GPS. If you have time for one question tonight, ask one. Small also helps for a second reason he gives. The space where new things are held is small, and long-term memory is huge. Pile on too much at once, and in his words, “nothing sticks.”
One caution about AI homework help. Brad says AI is “confident but often wrong.” A child new to a topic has no way to spot the mistake. He adds that a new topic needs teaching step by step first. Independence comes after the groundwork. We wrote more on AI homework and who does the thinking.
Key takeaways
- Easy study feels like learning: Rereading and highlighting feel productive but ask for little hard thinking.
- Close the book and ask: Pulling answers from memory beat rereading in a 2006 study.
- Skip the learning-style search: Reviews in 2008 and 2024 found matching teaching to styles not justified.
Should I find out my child’s learning style first?
It is a natural thought. Every child is different, so maybe each needs their own way in. Teaching to learning styles has been checked twice. Neither time did the evidence justify it.
In 2008, Pashler and colleagues found virtually no evidence that matching to a style helps. In 2024, Clinton-Lisell and Litzinger ran a meta-analysis. They judged any benefit too small and too rare to adopt. Yet a 2020 review by Newton and Salvi looked at educators in 18 countries. Nearly 9 in 10 still believed in learning styles. That measures belief, not what works. That isn’t a science problem. It’s a systems problem.
Brad sees a piece of it from the inside. He says teacher training spent “nowhere near enough” time on how learning and memory work. He also says newer teachers know far more than they used to.
So you do not need to sort your child first. Showing, saying and drawing the same idea is fine for every child. The myth is picking one way to suit one child. Closing the book and spacing it out are for every learner. If someone suggests sorting your child by style, ask a different question. Which skill comes first, and how much practice does it need? Our page on the learning styles myth sets out both reviews.
That isn’t a science problem. It’s a systems problem.
Laura Lurns · Learning Success expert
We believe your child is a capable learner, and hard thinking is part of it. For years, the system counted hours of study and rarely taught how memory works. So children keep rereading, and parents keep wondering why it fades. You don’t need a credential to be your child’s first teacher. You already are one. When your child wants to quit the hard part, start with the free Grit Download.
See what All Access gives your childIs your child struggling in school?
Get your free personalized learning roadmap
You describe what you see at home. We turn it into a plan you start this week.
- Answer 5 short questionnaires about what you already notice, 30–45 minutes at your own kitchen table
- Your child sits no test and gets no score: nothing to schedule, nothing for them to dread
- You do the answering, the AI does the writing, and a person reviews it before it reaches you
- Access all 40+ courses instantly: reading, math, focus, processing and more, with new ones added regularly
Why we use AI, plainly: it writes from a knowledge base our team maintains and audits. We work through it line by line and pull anything the evidence stops supporting. The roadmap you get on Tuesday reflects what we corrected on Monday, and a human still reads it before you do.
Your school district must evaluate your child free of charge if you ask in writing, whatever your income and whatever the outcome (US, 34 CFR 300.111 and 300.301(b)). That route takes time and answers a different question than you do. This one starts today, from what you already know.
Your answers stay yours. We do not sell your personal information, and we do not hand identifiable assessment data to outside AI companies to train their models.
A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too. That is the only route to those supports.



